UUP earns three ILCA awards

UUP’s membership magazine, website and television ad are visually appealing and effectively communicate the union’s message.

So says the International Labor Communications Association (ILCA), which in August recognized UUP with four Labor Media Awards for work produced in 2009.

“We are very proud that our efforts are recognized year after year by professionals who understand the nature of labor communications,” said UUP President Phil Smith.

The Voice won a second place award for Best Cover for the illustration “The squeeze is on.”

The September 2009 cover, top, was created by UUP publications specialist Karen Mattison.

“Very nice photo illustration and important topic to showcase,” according to the judges.

The issue also earned third-place honors for Best Publication Design. The September 2009 issue included six pages of illustrations and other graphic elements designed by Mattison that complemented stories on the harmful effects of SUNY budget cuts, as well as 14 pages of photos, graphics and stories of interest to members.

The “Save SUNY Hospitals” TV ad picked up second-place honors for Best Video Spot/Short Promo. The ad illustrated the negative effects that proposed cuts would have on patients and services, and ended with a call to action that yielded thousands of faxes and phones calls pressuring lawmakers to restore the funds. The 30-second spot, center, was produced under the direction of UUP Director of Communications Denyce Duncan Lacy.

“Amid crushing economic news, this campaign had to break through the statewide media clutter—and it did so by focusing a large public audience on the essentials for a successful New York future,” the judges wrote.

The union’s website, www.uupinfo.org – administered by webmaster Ken Holman – earned a third-place award for Best Content, bottom.

— Karen L. Mattison

Labor notes

Working America: AFL-CIO to mobilize unemployed voters—Working America is launching a campaign that will organize and mobilize hundreds of thousands of unemployed workers across the nation for the November elections. The campaign will engage unemployed Working America members who are registered voters by reaching out to them in their homes, on the street and in unemployment offices, with the goal of rallying voters around the crucial issues of jobs and trade. During this past year, Working America has spoken to more than 25,000 people a week about jobs and the economy through door-to-door canvasses, and through a combination of face-to-face and mail campaigns. In addition to talking to everyday voters on the streets, field organizers in 12 cities are talking to unemployed workers at unemployment offices and job training facilities. Workers at these facilities will have the chance to fill out “Help Wanted” petitions to send to Congress asking them what they’ve done to create jobs and help unemployed workers.

The survey says … Good news about union approval ratings—The latest Gallup survey on public attitudes toward unions shows a modest increase in approval ratings since last year, but the new ratings are still barely above 50 percent. Despite that finding, however, the long-term outlook for union popularity remains good, according to a new report from the Center for American Progress Action Fund. The poor economy is clearly the reason for the relatively low approval ratings—which have tended to be about 60 percent in the Gallup survey—according to David Madland and Karla Walter in their paper, “Why Is the Public Suddenly Down on Unions?” One more recent factor is a concerted anti-union campaign being waged by some conservative groups, which may have had some influence on public opinion. Likewise, the report points out, the government bailout of GM and Chrysler was highly unpopular, and unions’ reputations suffered as well. “Unions may need to work on their public image in order for approval ratings to return to pre-recession levels,” the report notes. In response to the latest Gallup numbers, American Rights at Work has put together talking points that draw heavily from other research and can be used to help counter some of the negative news. The research shows that Americans (especially African-Americans and Hispanics) continue to see the value of unions. Conversely, the public has much higher negative opinions of big corporations and financial institutions, compared with unions.

The poll is online at http://www.gallup.com/poll/142007/Americans-Approval-Labor-Unions-Remains-Near-Record-%20Low.aspx.

From OSHA: AFT gets grant to expand health, safety training —The AFT has received a grant from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration that will help the union expand the capacity of its health and safety program. OSHA announced Sept. 9 that the AFT will receive $220,000 as one of the 45 winners of Susan Harwood Capacity Building Grants. The grant will help the AFT to: build stronger health and safety committees at the local level; and expand its network of health and safety trainers and get basic information to workers on preventing work-related injuries and illnesses. OSHA awarded nearly $6.7 million to 30 organizations—including the AFT—that already are providing occupational safety and health training, education and related assistance to their constituents.

In other words, VPP John Marino: Take time to review your documents

This is the time of year that always reminds me that it is the beginning of the work year. The kids go back to school and summer vacations are over; it’s a new beginning. It is also a good time to make sure that all of your documents are in place and accurate.

Here are a few things I recommend you consider as you start the new work year:

• Review your appointment letter to make sure it is accurate.

Of course, you should do this when you first receive it, but it’s always a good idea to double check. Mistakes in job titles, appointment types and dates can—and do—happen, and may be missed the first time around. If you were promoted during the year, make sure the changes in title and salary level (SL) rank are correct.

If you have any questions about it, ask your UUP chapter for help.

• Make an appointment with Human Resources to review your personnel file.

This exercise is often overlooked by members, but it is important to check your file and make sure that you are comfortable with its contents.

Sometimes documents are included that you are unaware of, and sometimes there are items that are missing from your personnel file. If you review the contents of your file every year, it is far less likely that things will fall through the cracks. And, if they should, you will have a better chance of noticing and correcting it.

• Review your performance program to make sure you are performing the duties that were outlined for you during the current period.

If you are having difficulties with any of your duties and responsibilities, you should speak to your supervisor and ask for help or training, if needed.

UUP members sometimes agree to duties and responsibilities at the beginning of the year, only to find out they’ve “bitten off more than they can chew.” It’s important to have an open dialogue with your immediate supervisor.

If your performance program is overly ambitious, you may need to have it adjusted. It is vital that you are able to do all of your duties well. Remember, you will be evaluated on what is in your performance program.

• Consider if it’s time to ask for a promotion or salary increase.

Once you’ve reviewed your appointment letter, personnel file and performance program—and found everything in order—it may be time to consider asking for a promotion or raise.

If your personnel file contains some “good job” letters or otherwise proves that you’ve advanced in your career, and your performance program and evaluations also show you have become an asset to the college, why not ask for a promotion or salary increase?

UUP has prepared a booklet to help guide you through the process, left.

The guide is easily accessible on our website at www.uupinfo.org. Click on “Reports/Guides” on the left-hand toolbar and you’ll find the easy-to-understand guide in a PDF format.

You can also stop by your chapter office to pick up a paper copy. While you’re there, feel free to ask your chapter leaders for additional help.

You can also contact me at UUP?headquarters at (518) 640-6600 or by e-mail at jmarino@uupmail.org.

NYSUT Benefit: Payroll, pension deduction saves money

Payroll deduction of NYSUT Member Benefits-endorsed programs eliminates check writing and late payments. This payment option is available to eligible bargaining unit members.

Pension deduction is available to retirees collecting a monthly pension benefit from the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System or New York State Employees’ Retirement System. It’s also an option for retirees who receive income from a monthly lifetime annuity from TIAA-CREF.

Annual premiums are easier to budget, since they are divided into smaller payments deducted from 26 paychecks or from 12 monthly pension benefits.

Payroll and pension deduction also yield reduced premiums or additional coverage at no cost for these NYSUT Member Benefits-endorsed programs: term life insurance; catastrophe major medical insurance; long-term care insurance; disability insurance; automobile, homeowners/renters, boat, personal excess liability (umbrella) and other personal property insurance; financial counseling program, legal service plan; and retiree dental plan.

The WrapPlan® II flexible premium adjustable life insurance plan can also be purchased using deductions.

For specifics, visit www.member benefits.nysut.org and click on the Payroll & Pension Deduction tab on the left-hand side of the home page. Or call Member Benefits at (800) 626-8101.

(For information about contractual endorsement arrangements with providers of endorsed programs, please contact NYSUT Member Benefits or refer to your NYSUT Member Benefits Trust Summary Plan Description. Agency fee payers to NYSUT are eligible to participate in NYSUT Member Benefits-endorsed programs.)

AFT+ offers plans to protect pets

Pet lovers need worry no more—there are two AFT+ Member Benefits programs that will help keep pets happy and healthy, and more money in members’ pockets.

For as low as $11.95 a month, AFT+ pet insurance can protect members against large, unexpected veterinary expenses. Policies include older pets, accident-only coverage and more. For more information, call (866) 473-7387.

AFT+ also offers a Pet Assure veterinary care benefit. Members can save 25 percent at participating veterinarians on preventative care, shots, lab work, surgery, X-rays, medications and more.

All pets are covered, including exotics and horses, and there are no exclusions for older pets.

For more information, call (888) 789-7387 and use Code UP2003.

Information on these and other AFT+ programs can be found on the AFT website at www.aft.org/benefits.

Getting the most from your Delta Dental plan

Did you know that you could save money with a Delta Dental PPO dentist?

Although you can visit any dentist, you will usually pay less when you visit a Delta Dental PPO dentist because these dentists agreed to accept Delta Dental PPO contracted fees as full payment. That means your share of the bill will likely be lower than when you visit a non-Delta Dental dentist.

To find a current listing of Delta Dental’s in-network providers, follow these steps:

• Visit www.deltadentalins.com and click on Find a Dentist.

• Select Delta Dental PPO as your plan network.

• Make sure to ask specifically if your dentist is a contracted Delta Dental PPO dentist. Simply asking if a dentist “accepts Delta Dental” does not guarantee he or she is a contracted PPO dentist.

If you cannot find a PPO dentist in your area, the next best option is the Delta Dental Premier network. The Premier network is Delta’s larger network, consisting of nearly 80 percent of dentist locations nationwide.

You can find Premier dentists by following the same steps at Delta Dental’s website; however, you must select Delta Dental Premier instead of Delta Dental PPO. Please note that the contracted fees for Premier dentists are usually slightly higher than those of PPO dentists. Premier dentists will not bill you above their contracted fees, so you still receive cost protections not available with a non-Delta Dental dentist.

Feel free to contact the UUP Benefit Trust Fund at (800) 887-3863 if you have any questions regarding your UUP Benefit Trust Fund coverage or visit us at www.uupinfo.org.

— Doreen Bango, Manager, UUP Member Benefits and Services

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS – 2010 Needs Assessment and Member Input

INDIVIDUAL MEMBER SUGGESTIONS

UUP’s current contract will expire on July 1, 2011. When we make demands at the negotiations table, we are frequently asked to provide examples and details to support our positions. The most convincing arguments often come from our members’ anecdotal stories. Please describe the details of a need or problem you feel could be addressed through contract negotiations. Careful review of members’ suggestions will be a critical component of UUP’s needs assessment and information gathering process leading up to contract negotiations.

June 2010

To the Point: PHEEIA’s down—but not out

It is obvious to me that one of the biggest reasons we were able to set aside the so-called Public Higher Education Empowerment and Innovation Act (PHEEIA) was because someone got involved.

You.

Thousands of you spoke out against the Act, calling, e-mailing and faxing legislators. From the outset, we spoke up against the elimination of SUNY’s governmental oversight and its accountability under existing state statutes. We made access and affordability statewide issues.

SUNY supporters, many of them contacted through our Save SUNY website, www.savesuny.org, also took action and played an important role. That site and the UUP website yielded nearly 25,000 faxes and more than 4,500 online petition signatures.

And despite Gov. David Paterson’s insistence that PHEEIA be part of the state’s 2010-11 budget, the legislators listened, even the two senators from Buffalo and Long Island who held out for weeks for PHEEIA’s approval. Finally, on Aug. 3, the state budget was adopted without the ill-conceived Act.

The outcome could have been drastically different. PHEEIA had somehow become the last stumbling block to passing a very late state budget. Without your loud voices and UUP’s full-court press, legislators may have felt forced to give in.

They felt forced in May, when they approved an emergency budget extender bill that included the governor’s plan to furlough 100,000 state workers—including UUPers—one day a week until the budget was passed. State business would have stopped without the extender bill.

That’s when we stepped in and took care of business. UUP and other state unions immediately obtained a stay to stop the furloughs, which were blocked May 28 by federal Judge Lawrence Kahn. Another challenge met; another crisis averted.

While the furloughs are history, PHEEIA isn’t. This nebulous proposal, which was pushed hard by SUNY, will be back at some point, you can be sure of that. Senate Democrats say they have a “framework” of a deal on PHEEIA with the Assembly, but no details have emerged since that Aug. 3 announcement.

While we should feel satisfaction for a job well done, it’s not time to be patting each other on the back.

We must be ready, at a moment’s notice, to forcefully speak out against PHEEIA, which would essentially corporatize SUNY by allowing campuses to raise tuition and enter into contracts and leases without state oversight.

We must also be ready to combat PHEEIA rhetoric, like inaccuracies found in an August Buffalo News editorial blasting legislators for dropping PHEEIA from the budget. The editorial claims SUNY tuition increases were returned to the state in the past, and that PHEEIA would end “state sweeps” of tuition money into the general fund. That has never been the case; SUNY has always controlled tuition dollars.

Here’s more reality: SUNY sustained a $152 million state aid cut in the new budget. The New York State Theatre Institute lost $1.6 million—more than half of what it got last year.

More hiring freezes, job cuts, larger classes and fewer courses will undoubtedly be the outcome. Campuses have dealt with those issues over the past two years due to state budget cuts that account for more than 25 percent of SUNY’s operating budget.

The time is now for SUNY to help cover shortfalls in SUNY’s state-slashed budget. I’ve said this before: UUP will hold the chancellor to her promise to use $147 million in reserves to help cover state cuts.

We’d like to see SUNY offer even more financial help for our cash-strapped campuses and hospitals. More funding would add needed fuel to SUNY, one of the state’s most prolific economic engines. And it will allow campuses to continue to offer a quality, affordable education to students across New York, which, after all, is SUNY’s mission.

Looking back, we can feel secure in knowing that we fought hard for what we believed in, and we made a difference. As we enter a new academic year, we will face our share of challenges. This union will step up and meet those challenges head-on. But we need you to take a stand.

I hope and trust that you will join us as we face each crisis and strive to keep UUP strong.

Capitol corner: PHEEIA absent in final state budget

In a year of unprecedented political and financial volatility in New York state, it’s inevitable that SUNY would be affected. But the University found itself squarely in the middle of the state budget battle over the summer, when the governor used the so-called Public Higher Education Empowerment and Innovation Act (PHEEIA) as a bargaining chip that for months blocked passage of the last component of a new state budget.

UUP waged a fierce fight against PHEEIA—and it paid off. When the state Senate approved the final piece of the state budget Aug. 3—a revenue bill—PHEEIA was not a part of it. Sens. William Stachowski and Brian Foley, who represent districts near Buffalo Center and Stony Brook, respectively, surrendered in their collective effort to stall approval of the revenue bill unless it included PHEEIA.

“In putting aside the enactment of the governor’s proposal to permit SUNY to unilaterally raise tuition and enter into public/private partnerships, the Legislature has preserved access and affordability while protecting SUNY’s core public mission,” said UUP President Phil Smith. “We thank them for their thoughtful and wise decision regarding an issue of critical importance to all New Yorkers.”

But pushing PHEEIA aside was not easy.

The union waged an aggressive multi-media campaign that included half-page ads in several major newspapers, including The New York Times and Newsday, as well as in nearly 150 weekly newspapers. The ad asked readers to visit savesuny.org, a website launched by UUP to promote public awareness of the dangers of state budget cuts and PHEEIA. The site encouraged visitors to sign an online petition and fax letters urging lawmakers to reject the SUNY budget cuts and SUNY flexibility proposal. That micro website and uupinfo.org yielded nearly 25,000 faxes and more than 4,500 online petition signatures. In addition, Smith wrote an opinion column presenting the case against PHEEIA that appeared in nearly a dozen newspapers. Six other daily newspapers printed a letter to the editor from Smith.

The budget was more than two months late when the governor placed the PHEEIA legislation in his June 28 budget extender bill. The Legislature—faced with the choice of approving the extender bill or rejecting it and sparking a state government shutdown—put together and approved an alternative budget plan without PHEEIA. Their action removed the governor’s chief political weapon: the threat of a government shutdown. But the budget remained incomplete because of the Senate’s inability to pass the revenue bill.

The stalemate continued as proponents of PHEEIA waged a desperate campaign to turn the tide in their favor. For example, when UUP member Edward Herman of Buffalo Center wrote an opinion column against PHEEIA that ran in the Buffalo News, proponents fired back with letters and columns attempting to undermine UUP’s position. But UUP’s message was getting through, as exemplified in an editorial in The New York Times.

“Giving New York’s university system a few world-class campuses is a lofty idea. It just doesn’t belong in a hastily drawn compromise as part of a very late budget. The Legislature should drop the idea and finish the budget,” The Times wrote.

While UUP succeeded in turning PHEEIA aside, the fight is not yet over. Even as the Senate voted to finalize the budget without PHEEIA, Senate Democratic Conference Leader John Sampson announced the “framework” of a deal on SUNY “empowerment” had been reached with the governor and the leadership in the state Assembly.

Details of the deal had not been released as The Voice went to press.

“We’re not exactly sure what this means,” Smith said. “We do know that we need to continue to be vigilant to protect SUNY as an institution of public higher education.”

The details on SUNY budget cuts were clear, and gloomy. Facing an ultimatum from the governor to enact a new state budget, the Legislature approved a portion of the spending plan that trimmed SUNY’s budget by another $152 million, bringing the total reduction for the state-operated campuses to $562 million over a two-year period.

Given the late passage of the budget, the full impact of this latest round of cuts had yet to unfold, but UUP members are bracing for more of what they’ve already seen: hiring freezes, job losses, fewer courses, larger class sizes and many more students looking to enroll at SUNY.

The hurt has already hit System Administration, where the University’s decision to shut Nylink translates to the loss of 12 jobs in Albany. Nylink provides a variety of services to more than 500 libraries, including most of SUNY’s and all of CUNY’s libraries. SUNY claims declines in Nylink’s revenues as a result of a changing business environment led to its demise.

“SUNY’s decision to shut down Nylink is very unfortunate,” said John Schumacher, UUP chapter president at System Administration. “Nylink was making real progress toward re-establishing the revenue needed.”

The New York State Theatre Institute took a major hit—$1.6 million—more than half of its state support. With more than a dozen chapter members exploring early retirement, NYSTI Chapter President John Romeo predicts NYSTI will face a difficult road ahead.

“NYSTI’s operation will be downsized, the amount of education and production will be downsized, and the administration will be severely hogtied as a result of the governor’s cuts,” Romeo said.

Even before the budget gained approval, Stony Brook’s administration virtually closed its Southampton campus effective this fall. Thirty-three employees received non-renewal notices; 42 others were transferred to the main Stony Brook campus.

Also on Long Island, about 200 part-time faculty at Farmingdale got served with non-renewals.

Now is the time for SUNY to dip into its rainy day funds, Smith said.

“This is more than just a passing shower—SUNY is reeling from a torrential downpour,” he said. “We must hold the chancellor to the promise she made during legislative budget hearings to apply $147 million from SUNY’s reserves to make up for state aid cuts.”

— Donald Feldstein