UUP members at Stony Brook HSC played a big part in the success of the second annual Suffolk County Minority Health Summit. Eleven UUPers took part in the daylong event, co-sponsored by the Stony Brook HSC chapter, the Center for Public Health and Health Policy Research at Stony Brook (CPHHPR), the Suffolk County Minority Health Action Coalition (SMHAC) and Literacy Suffolk, Inc. It was held Nov. 21 at Stony Brook’s Southampton campus. “The summit was definitely successful and it was well received,” said Jewel Stafford, a UUPer and CPHHPR’s research coordinator. “We were humbled by the community presence that was there and how many people are really committed to improving their community through a collective vision.” About 80 Suffolk County residents attended the event, intended to reach out to communities on the eastern end of Long Island, which has limited access to vital health care resources. The summit was designed to identify minority health issues and develop methods to address those concerns. “Through the summit, we’re trying to aid underserved people in the community and get them the health care information that they need,” said Charles Hines, Stony Brook HSC’s chapter treasurer and a UUP delegate. “We’re a hospital and a health technology center. We can incorporate all our skills into this.” The summit is an extension of the CPHHPR, which is committed to improving the health of Long Island residents through researching critical public health issues there—including a lack of access to cancer screening, growing incidence of HIV/AIDS and increased gang violence. Stafford said there’s every intention to stage a third summit in 2010. “We have this consistent presence, this collective unit that’s dedicated to address the needs of these communities.” — Michael Lisi |
Author Archives: United University Professions Admin
November 2009
Take a stand for SUNY
It is time to take a stand. SUNY is under attack. The University’s viability and its future as a world-class higher education institution are under attack. SUNY’s very mission of quality, accessibility and affordability is under attack. The latest salvo came Oct. 6, when Gov. David Paterson ordered $90 million in midyear state aid cuts to SUNY. That huge cash grab from the University has knocked SUNY funding to its lowest levels since the 1990s. The implications of these cuts are many, and are all negative for SUNY. We cannot and will not let this happen without a fight. It is time to take a stand. For months, I have detailed the dire consequences continued cuts to SUNY would mean for the University, college-bound high school and transfer students and their parents, and New York’s economy. Now, cuts to SUNY have become so drastic that the cost-cutting measures campuses put in place last year—everything from hiring freezes to cutting courses to increasing class sizes—may not be enough to see them through without considering other, much more unsavory, options. Already, two departments at Morrisville are in active retrenchment. At Plattsburgh, the administration is threatening to cut 66 positions to help cover a nearly $4 million budget shortfall. And this just in: In just 12 months, more than 153 full-time positions and 468 part-time jobs have been chopped from SUNY. Meanwhile, more and more financial pressure is being foisted on students and parents in the form of tuition and fees to make up for continued state aid decreases. In 1990, SUNY funded $915 million, or 75 percent of the University’s operating budget, with 25 percent financed by students and parents. Now, the state’s share of SUNY’s budget will be $907 million—$8 million less than it spent 19 years ago! As for the share students and parents will pay this year: a whopping $1.1 billion. It’s time to take a stand. Thankfully, many of you have heeded my call for action, joining with the UUP Outreach Committee or working to form and mobilize campus crisis outreach groups to rail against Paterson’s cuts and help spread the word that SUNY is the solution to the state’s economic woes. In October, more than 100 of you boarded buses to Manhattan and stopped rush hour traffic as you waved signs, shouted chants and marched to protest cuts to SUNY and the City University of New York, which is facing cuts targeted by the state of $53 million. Others, like UUPers in Plattsburgh, Buffalo, Oneonta, Oswego and Albany, took part in student-led rallies against SUNY cuts at campuses across the state. That’s right, the students have also launched a battle for SUNY. Led by the SUNY Student Assembly, students on campuses statewide have staged rallies opposing Paterson’s cuts. They also gathered more than 10,000 signatures for their “Many Voices, One SUNY” campaign, which opposes SUNY cuts. That’s not surprising considering that students are the ones who see and feel firsthand the impact of these cuts: a shortage of courses, fewer, more crowded classes and fewer instructors to teach them. All this after fighting to gain admission to a SUNY school, which has become increasingly tougher as applications and enrollments reach all-time highs. Students, many of whom were blindsided by a tuition increase in the spring, have more to fear. The governor is proposing to cut $26 million—or about $120 per grant—from the state’s Tuition Assistance Program (TAP), which helps students pay for college. They are telling lawmakers and the governor they can’t afford these cuts. I wholeheartedly encourage you to team up with students on your campus to fight these heinous cuts to the University. If you don’t know the student leaders on your campus, you can call the UUP Administrative Office for contact names and numbers. Speaking of lawmakers, a few of our friends have publicly opposed the governor’s aid reductions. Most recently, Sen. Ken LaValle, ranking minority member of the Senate Higher Education Committee, went on the record saying that SUNY should not be subjected to the type of cuts proposed by the governor. Sen. Toby Stavisky and Assemblywoman Deborah Glick previously came out against the cuts. Glick said it was “counterintuitive to heap more cuts” on SUNY and CUNY. Stavisky called the reductions “an unfair burden on New York’s students and the state’s economic future.” Now it’s your turn. We need you to step up and advocate for SUNY. Reach out to the UUP Outreach Committee. Get involved on campus. At the very least, go to the UUP Web site, www.uupinfo.org, and click on links to letters that will be faxed via computer to Gov. Paterson and state legislators. We must keep up the fight to protect SUNY students, for quality higher education in New York, and for the state’s economic future. The state university is an engine that can help pull New York from its economic mire. It’s time to take a stand. |
Raising our voices: Unionists, students unite to save public higher education
Nelson Perez knew he had to do something. His dream of being one of the first in his family to earn a college degree hung in the balance. Perez, a college-bound senior at New York City’s Food and Finance High School, was well aware of the deep midyear cuts to SUNY and the City University of New York (CUNY)—$90 million and a targeted $53 million, respectively—ordered Oct. 6 by Gov. David Paterson. That’s why he was at a podium at the corner of E. 68th Street and 5th Avenue in Manhattan on a rainy October evening, looking out over hundreds of sign-waving CUNY students and higher ed unionists—including more than 100 UUP members—gathered to protest the latest wave of state cuts. “For me,” Perez said, “being the first generation in my family to go to college, I need as many doors open as I can get.” Too many doors have already slammed shut for Perez and thousands of New York’s college-bound high school and community college transfer students, due to ever-deeper state aid cuts to SUNY. And more will close unless UUPers, legislators, parents and the students themselves step up and start speaking out, said UUP President Phillip Smith. “We cannot sit still as SUNY is systematically dismantled,” Smith said. “We must unite and fight to keep SUNY strong.” Students, legislators sign on SUNY students have certainly gotten the message. Less than a month after Paterson announced his midyear cuts, SUNY students mobilized to protest SUNY cuts at nearly two dozen rallies statewide. Legislators have also chimed in, including the chairs of the Legislature’s Higher Education committees, Sen. Toby Ann Stavisky and Assemblywoman Deborah Glick, and Sen. Ken LaValle, ranking minority member of the Senate Higher Education Committee. LaValle, Stavisky and Glick are on record in opposition to the cuts. So are Sens. Darrel J. Aubertine, Neil D. Breslin, Brian X. Foley, Suzi Oppenheimer, William Stachowski and David. J. Valesky. They joined Stavisky in decrying the cuts in an Oct. 8 statement on Stavisky’s Senate Web site (http://www.nysenate.gov/press-release/governors-proposed-cuts-higher-education). “We believe this is an unfair burden on New York’s students and the state’s economy,” the statement said. Students and UUPers echoed that message in rallies at Plattsburgh, Albany, Oneonta, Buffalo, Oswego, New Paltz and more than 15 other two- and four-year SUNY schools in late October and early November. Staged by the SUNY Student Assembly, the University’s statewide student government organization, the events drew hundreds of students and UUP members to rally against SUNY cuts. “Students are concerned with being able to afford school and there’s fear that another tuition increase could still be on the table,” said SUNY Student Assembly President Melody Mercedes, a Buffalo University senior. “Class sizes are larger, fewer services are available and all at a higher price. There is genuine fear.” At Plattsburgh, UUPers joined with students to decry the cuts; at the end of the rally, dozens of students symbolically burned fake $100 bills with Paterson’s face on them. “It is unwise and unfair to balance the state budget on the backs of students,” said Plattsburgh UUPer James Armstrong. “Why should students and parents be the ones to suffer?” “I’m the student that no one wanted,” said Plattsburgh senior Lisa Rinaldi. “Those like me who have been told to ‘sit down, shut up and be quiet’ now need to speak up, be heard and be listened to. This is a violent act against us.” It’s easy to understand the students’ ire over cuts to SUNY; they are the ones feeling the sting of more than $410 million in cuts to SUNY over the last 18 months. They’ve seen fewer courses, increased class sizes and a reduction in the number of instructors through hiring freezes. After absorbing an unexpected spring tuition increase, students receiving funds from the state’s Tuition Assistance Program (TAP) could lose as much as $120 per TAP grant with Paterson’s plan to cut $26 million from the program in 2009-10. Meanwhile, it’s become increasingly difficult to gain admission to SUNY schools, as campuses deal with record enrollment and applications. And thousands of students will likely be turned away from SUNY campuses this year because schools won’t have the funds to offer enough courses to handle the enrollment growth. “We need to educate students about what’s going on because it affects all of us,” Mercedes said. “Our purpose is to educate students to reach out to legislators. We’re fighting for our education.” Plattsburgh Chapter President David Curry lauded students for lashing out against the cuts to SUNY. “The students clearly recognize the challenge to public higher education that this budget cut represents,” he said. “They understand the value of investing in higher education.” Smith, who in October urged chapter leaders to form “crisis outreach committees” to spread the word locally about the impact of cuts to SUNY, said he hoped members will work with students to protest the cuts and to stress how a properly funded SUNY can do much to extricate New York from its financial situation. “There is great power when we all unite for positive change,” said Smith. “Together, we can keep the University whole.” — Michael Lisi |
UUP strikes back over SUNY budget cuts
Just days after Gov. Paterson imposed a devastating $90 million midyear budget cut for SUNY, UUP President Phillip Smith took the union’s concerns to state lawmakers. Testifying Oct. 21 before the Assembly Ways and Means Committee, Smith said the $90 million reduction to SUNY was the largest affecting all state agencies. It meant SUNY was being asked to absorb 18 percent of the total $500 million reduction. “Even in the face of a state fiscal crisis, there is no reasonable justification to place such an undue burden on one state agency,” Smith testified. He stressed that students are bearing the brunt of this series of budget cuts. “In 1990, the state funded 75 percent of the University’s operating budget. After the governor’s latest reduction, students are now financing more than half of SUNY’s operating budget,” Smith said. Cuts run deep Smith told lawmakers that, in the last 18 months, state support for SUNY dropped by a shocking $410 million. That translates to 17 percent of SUNY’s operating budget. Smith warned that budget slicing has already exacted a toll on the University in the form of swelling class sizes, frequent course cancellations, delayed graduations, denied admissions and fewer full-time faculty. Smith said the cuts could not have come at a worse time. “It is particularly unfortunate that these cuts have occurred during a time of economic recession, when educating or retraining New York’s workforce is particularly imperative, and at a time when college affordability has become an issue of statewide importance,” Smith testified. UUP’s statewide affiliate NYSUT also linked SUNY’s well-being to the state’s economic future. “Our public universities are being cut when the demand for their services is at an all-time high,” NYSUT Director of Legislation Stephen Allinger testified. “This is counterproductive when you consider that intellectual capital is what is driving economies around the world and is what our state needs to foster economic growth.” SUNY’s hospitals and health science centers are not immune to the state budget malaise. Smith said state subsidy reductions combined with Medicaid cuts have pushed them to the breaking point. “The quality of health care provided by these institutions is already at great risk, and further reductions in Medicaid support will undermine their ability to serve the needy,” Smith testified. He urged lawmakers to reverse the $90 million budget cut and to protect SUNY hospitals from additional Medicaid cuts. Earlier, Smith testified in New York City on another matter of concern to SUNY and UUP—balancing traditional teaching with research and technology. Addressing the Governor’s Task Force on Diversifying the New York Economy through Industry/Higher Education Cooperation, Smith said the focus on research and technology has been overemphasized for the last 20 years. “We certainly agree that university/industry affiliations are important to both the University’s reputation and the state’s economic growth,” Smith testified. “But there needs to be more of a balanced approach. The University needs to reaffirm its original emphasis on teaching and learning.” — Donald Feldstein |
UUP continues its district advocacy and training
If not now, when? If not you, who? These simple phrases have become the mantras of union officers and UUP Outreach Committee members, who are calling on all of their colleagues to stand up and speak out for SUNY. “The governor’s midyear cuts are bleeding SUNY dry,” said UUP President Phillip Smith. “This isn’t just my fight. This is our fight, and everyone has a stake in it. We have to act like it’s our own job, our own students, that we’re fighting for—because it is.” UUP has placed extra emphasis on meeting with lawmakers in their home districts—and it’s beginning to pay off. In recent weeks, UUPers from a handful of chapters around the state have taken time out of their busy schedules to talk with legislators about SUNY’s role in the state’s economic recovery, and the devastation further cuts would have on the University and its students. Several chapters are leading the way by scheduling multiple meetings with lawmakers. For instance, the Upstate Medical University Chapter sent representatives to lawmakers’ offices on five separate occasions since October—and walked away feeling better about the support Upstate and SUNY have on both sides of the political aisle. In a meeting with Assemblyman Albert Stirpe (D-North Syracuse), UUPers David Peckham, Brian Tappen and Carol Braund stressed the need to keep SUNY and its hospitals intact. “We recognize that New York state is money-starved and every program and agency will face cuts,” said Tappen, a member of the statewide UUP Executive Board. “But it was good to hear firsthand that Assemblyman Stirpe agrees with UUP when we say that education and health care cuts should be ‘least and last, not first and most.’” Assemblyman Will Barclay (R-Fulton) saw eye to eye with UUP about the damaging cuts SUNY has faced, as well as on the dangers of proposed flexibility legislation. Barclay agrees that SUNY should have some flexibility to improve efficiency, but rejects the idea of full autonomy. Barclay told the UUPers he opposes A./S.2020 and similar legislation that runs counter to SUNY’s mission of providing an affordable, accessible, quality public higher education. Dozens of the rank-and-file unionists who have met with lawmakers had earlier taken part in one of several regional training sessions. The training is designed to educate UUPers on the union’s key issues and to supply them with the tools they need to make the case for SUNY. The UUP Outreach Committee has been conducting training sessions around the state on how to advocate for the union and University. People who take part in the training are provided with talking points on the union’s priority issues, as well as a complete contact list for state senators and assemblymembers. Trainees also take part in role-playing activities and learn successful advocacy practices. “In order to advocate on behalf of UUP and SUNY, we must engage in local advocacy,” Outreach Committee Co-chair Glenn McNitt told participants during an Oct. 28 training session in Albany. “Representatives often have more time to spend talking with us, and legislators pay special attention to constituents who visit their district office.” — Karen L. Mattison |
UUP Outreach faces huge task
None of the nearly 40 members of the UUP Outreach Committee minced words about the challenges UUP and SUNY face during the committee’s retreat Nov. 6-7 in Albany. And the threat posed by flexibility is near the top of the committee’s worry list. “Flexibility threatens to dismantle the public nature of the University,” UUP President Phillip Smith told committee members. “Selling or leasing campus property removes opportunities for future expansion of academic programs and services.” The chances for final legislative approval of A./S.2020—the bill that would allow the University at Buffalo to sell or lease campus property and charge differential tuition—have waned, committee members were told. But another bill, S.5836, is lurking on the horizon. The bill would allow similar provisions at SUNY’s other university centers—Stony Brook, Binghamton and Albany—as well as at SUNY teaching hospitals in Brooklyn and Syracuse. “Not many people have been talking against it,” said Outreach Committee Co-chair Glenn McNitt. Over and above the governor’s $90 million midyear budget reduction for SUNY, Smith warned the University faces the prospect of more cuts down the road, citing that federal stimulus funds run out in 2012, and higher state tax rates on the wealthy end the following year. “We in Albany can’t do it alone,” Smith said in an appeal for increased participation in advocacy activities. “Lawmakers have to hear from the grassroots.” Committee members debated the form and content of the union’s 2010 Legislative Agenda that will be submitted to the Executive Board for final approval. Following that discussion, McNitt closed the retreat with a charge to the committee. “We should leave here knowing we’re better organized,” he said. “Develop a list of groups in the community you can talk to about our mutual concerns, and know what you’re going to say to them.” — Donald Feldstein |
UUP, affiliates step up for health care reform
The need for universal health care in America hit home recently for Cortland Chapter member Henry Steck. Steck’s wife, Janet, was hospitalized, underwent testing and was released the next day. Everything turned out fine except for the whopping $10,000 hospital bill, which the hospital initially said Steck had to pay because coverage didn’t fall under Medicare or health insurance. It turned out to be a hospital paperwork glitch, but Steck spent more than two hours on the phone with the insurance company to straighten it out. The incident prompted Steck to pen a resolution supporting meaningful health care reform; the Cortland Chapter submitted it during the 2009 Fall Delegate Assembly, where it was approved unanimously by delegates. “America is the only major industrialized country that doesn’t have a government-supported universal health care system,” Steck said. “Health care should be a right, not a transaction in a marketplace.” “This is a moral responsibility and a fiscal responsibility,” said Georges Fouron, vice chair of the union’s Human and Civil Rights Committee. “The citizens need this kind of protection. How we can tolerate this in a democracy like the U.S. is unconscionable.” Joining in Other UUPers have also joined the fight for health care reform and universal health care, strongly supporting President Barack Obama’s plan to provide health care stability and security for all Americans. At the Fall DA, delegates overwhelmingly adopted a resolution that asserted equal access to quality health care “as a human right.” Offered by the Human and Civil Rights and LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning) committees, it likens the right to health care to the rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” guaranteed in the Declaration of Independence. “If you define what human rights are, they ensure the safety and the advancement of all people,” said Oswego Chapter President Steven Abraham, chair of the Human and Civil Rights Committee. “Human rights are the right to be alive, to exist as a functioning member of society. Without health care, clearly you are denied those rights.” Even though most UUP members have health benefits and coverage through the union’s negotiated contract with the state, the issue is of prime concern to members, many of whom have family members and friends currently underinsured or uninsured. “As UUPers, we are wage earners, we don’t have great wealth,” Steck said. “If you get a catastrophic illness, you can run out of resources and in a matter of a few months, you can lose everything. We can’t accept this.” “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is connected with health care,” said Fouron. “I personally think the government has the responsibility to provide adequate health care.” Obama’s health care vision is, at last, beginning to take shape legislatively. In November, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its comprehensive health reform legislation; the Senate is working on its version of the bill. Both bills include a government-run public insurance option. The bills are designed to establish health insurance consumer protections, bar insurance industry practices like refusing coverage based on pre-existing medical conditions and stem rising medical costs nationwide. The AFL-CIO and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) are doing their part to push health care reform. Through its “Health Care for America Now” program, the AFL-CIO wants heath care reform that controls costs, provides comprehensive high-quality coverage for everyone, and calls on the government to ensure “fairness and efficiency” in the insurance system. The AFT is also calling for a public insurance option that provides coverage for all Americans. Under its plan, employer-provided health care benefits would not be taxed, and it would set appropriate staffing levels for nurses, which would help reduce patient re-admissions and health complications, save money and improve quality. — Michael Lisi |
Campus Equity Week calls attention to part-timer issues
They dubbed it the “Un/Happy Hour” to make a strong statement about the inadequacies part-time and contingent UUP faculty face in Cortland and on campuses across the state and nation. That’s how Cortland UUPers spotlighted Campus Equity Week (CEW) on their campus. The event was also an opportunity for members and students to say thank you to adjuncts for the essential work they do. “It was really meant to extend our appreciation to part-timers,” Cortland Chapter President Jamie Dangler said of the Oct. 29 event. “Our part-time members do feel that they are marginalized on the campus. They need to understand that we value them.” Held biannually, CEW is an AFT-sponsored national initiative to publicize issues of fairness and quality related to higher education part-time and contingent faculty in the U.S., Mexico and Canada. CEW was held Oct. 26-31. This year, UUP was one of hundreds of higher education unions affiliated with AFT that observed CEW by calling attention to the injustices these oft-exploited employees endure. “Campus Equity Week is a wail of pain and rage at some campuses, as sweeping layoffs are disguised as ‘nonrenewals’ and a quasi-invisible instructional faculty is gutted, unemployed and uninsured,” said UAlbany UUPer Jill Hanifan, who co-chairs the union’s Part-Time Concerns Committee. “At other campuses, it’s an urgent and sobering message about workload creep. It’s also been a catalyst for (administrators) to publicly acknowledge the essential contributions of part-time and contingent faculty.” UUP and its chapters have done the latter, achieving significant gains for part-timers since the first Campus Equity Week in 2001. Since then, chapters have worked for starting salary increases for part-timers and enacted separate labor/management meetings for part-time issues, as provided in UUP’s contract with the state. Statewide, UUP has secured full health, vision and dental benefits for eligible part-timers, as well as vacation and sick leave benefits. “UUP has worked tirelessly for the fair treatment of part-time and contingent faculty,” said UUP President Phillip Smith. “Their contributions are significant and deserve to be highlighted, and not just during Campus Equity Week.” Higher education unions nationwide have held up UUP’s negotiated gains for part-timers as examples of equity during their heated contract battles. Still, adjuncts are paid far less than full-time faculty and lack job security—which essentially robs them of academic freedom, proponents say. “Campus Equity Week raises the awareness of the contributions of part-timers and the insidious attack on tenure, as there is a rising number of contingent faculty in ranks of higher education across the country,” said Stony Brook HSC member Carolyn Kube, co-chair of UUP’s Part-Time Concerns Committee. Now more than ever, a growing number of SUNY colleges and universities are increasing their reliance on part-time faculty as a way to stem extreme state budget cuts to the University. Nearly half of Cortland’s faculty is made up of part-timers. Farmingdale and Plattsburgh also employ large numbers of adjuncts. At New Paltz, where more than 100 part-time faculty weren’t renewed in the fall due to campus budget-cutting measures, CEW was a chance to shine light on the importance of adjuncts there and statewide. New Paltz Chapter President Richard Kelder and Peter D.G. Brown, the chapter’s vice president for academics, talked with students and colleagues at a CEW informational table in the college’s Jacobson Faculty Tower. Said Kelder: “Many of our adjunct faculty have served the college with distinction and dedication for many years. They are entitled to job security and better compensation.” “We have achieved much, but our work is not done,” said Smith. “UUP will continue that battle.” — Michael Lisi |
UUP continues its fight for parity
For decades, part-time faculty at the nation’s colleges and universities have used legislation, litigation and negotiation in their struggle for fair wages and benefits. They’ve made their case in state legislatures, before the courts and at the bargaining table. Some have been won; many have been lost. But nowhere have there been more gains than in New York, where UUP has achieved unprecedented benefits for the part-time employees it represents. Specific gains were outlined in the 2001 AFT report “Marching Toward Equity: Curbing the Exploitation and Overuse of Part-time and Non-tenured Faculty,” in which it was reported that UUP’s 1999-2003 contract “resulted in one of the most comprehensive packages of part-time pay and benefits in the country so far.” “UUP has worked long and hard to make inroads for part-timers,” said UUP President Phillip Smith. “The gains we’ve made have taken years to achieve. It has been an uphill battle for UUP—both at the bargaining table and in campus labor/management meetings—but one we’ll keep on fighting. Our part-time colleagues have been exploited long enough.” Slowly but surely, UUP contracts over the years have grown to include provisions for part-time faculty that, in many areas, mirror those for full-time faculty, including year-round health insurance, contractual salary increases, lump sum payments, opportunities for professional development, and dental, vision and prescription drug coverage. A detailed fact sheet on contractual benefits can be found on the UUP Web site at www.uupinfo.org. Click on Benefits and scroll down to Part-timers. Since 2001, UUP chapters have taken a stand during Campus Equity Week (CEW), an international initiative designed to educate the public, college communities and policymakers on issues of fairness and equity for part-time faculty in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. UUP views CEW as one important way to raise awareness about the inequitable employment practices faced by part-timers and to highlight the quality of contributions they make on SUNY campuses (see related story, page 11). UUP’s new Task Force on Contingent Employees is another way the union is working for its members. In March, President Smith charged the committee to define “contingent” from the perspective of UUP and SUNY, and to identify the various relationships among contingent workers. The nine-member task force will recommend actions, policies and procedures to address the concerns of SUNY’s contingent faculty, such as part-timers who want full-time work and full-timers who want a tenure-track position or the opportunity for permanent appointment. “This is another important step in our journey for parity for all academic and professional members,” Smith said. “The task force report will give UUP the ammunition is needs to shoot holes in any arguments made by SUNY and the state.” The union’s Part-time Concerns Committee, co-chaired by Jill Hanifan of Albany and Carolyn Kube of Stony Brook HSC, has also created a Web site that includes a password-protected link for committee members to exchange ideas. To log on to the public site, go to www.uupinfo.org, click on Committees on the left side of the home page and then scroll down to Part-time Concerns Committee. And there’s a new national organization dedicated to achieving professional equity and advancing academic freedom for contingent faculty across the country. Called the New Faculty Majority: The National Coalition for Adjunct & Contingent Equity, the group’s board of directors includes UUP members Peter D.G. Brown of New Paltz, Ross Borden of Cortland and Anne Weigard of Cortland, who serves as secretary for New Faculty Majority. Go to www.newfacultymajority.info to learn more. – Karen L. Mattison |